I love books about books. This collection of essays about
literature is no exception. The fact that it comes from Umberto Eco, someone I
practically worship when it comes to words on paper, doesn’t hurt either, of
course.
This collection includes commentaries on specific works,
such as the Paradiso, The Communist Manifesto and Aristotle’s Poetics. Well, um, I haven’t actually
read any of these works, but I still feel like I learned a great deal from
reading Eco’s essays. That’s part of the beauty of reading Eco for me. I can
start out not knowing what the heck he’s talking about, but still feel invited
to join in because he’s pretty friendly to the ignorant masses to which I
belong.
There are also enjoyable and thought-provoking essays on
concepts like the function of literature, style, symbolism, and, my personal
favorite of this collection, intertextual irony. These ideas from Eco fascinate
me and have opened more doors in my personal armchair exploration of
literature. I need stuff like this: engaging to read, and packed with the kind
of ideas that were previously foreign to me since, let’s face it, I’ve made no
real formal study of literature.
I always feel both a little smarter and a little dumber each
time I read Eco. I feel smarter because I learn so much and have so many new
and interesting thoughts provoked. I feel dumber because I also learn how much
I don’t know, how much more there is to learn. I suppose I’m becoming a more
positive person, however, since, upon reading On Literature I feel more inspiration than exasperation. I am even
more fascinated by the cultural functions of story-telling and fiction. I am
curious about particular works of literature I used to fear. I am willing to
give the idea of deep analysis of literature for connections and symbols a
chance (although, I don’t think I’ll ever let go of the idea of just reading a
good, entertaining story.)
There are also essays about Eco's own background, influences and writing process that are inspriational. I, however, have come to the conclusion that I cannot be much like Umberto Eco. He is a
genius, an expert on literature and symbolism and culture and philosophy, and I’m
just a Distractible Reader. My view of intellectual reality always gets a bit
of a positive shift after I read his work, though, and my active interest in literature,
culture and history accelerates. In fact, I’m already seeing cases of
intertextual irony just about everywhere.
You might also like The Prague Cemetery by Umberto Eco
A Year of Books I Should Have Read by Now
No comments:
Post a Comment