The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West
I was one of very few women I know, if not the only one, who had not yet read this book. Well, now that I’ve read it, I can say that I enjoyed it, and cannot think of why it took me so long to get around to doing so.
This is the “origin story” of the Wicked Witch of the West, the antagonist to Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz. In Maguire’s treatment, the Witch, whose given name is Elphaba, is not a cookie-cutter fairy tale prop. Her green skin is only the first of her problems and her intellectualism and deep thinking are in grave contrast to the shallow, pretty people she seems to find herself among so often. She is a complex person whose passions are motivated by a lifetime of pain, guilt and, eventually, obsession.
Not only the Wicked Witch, but the land of Oz itself gets a deeper study and explanation in Wicked. Oz seems less like the strange, magical, random land Dorothy discovered but a politically unstable and oppressed nation with rigidly defined social classes and racism. Not surprisingly, much of the beauty is only skin deep. I got the feeling that the details in Wicked are the behind-the-scenes realities that Dorothy would fail to notice, being just a child.
Maguire presents his version of Oz with much of the lilting, poetic, clever style of a children’s story, but with an adult vocabulary and adult situations. I would say that the language of this novel was its most enjoyable aspect to me. Sure, Elphaba’s story is worthy and interesting, but I found even more joy in reading descriptions like, “To Glinda she [Elphaba] looked tired and terrified, but strong, as if her form were knit with iron and whiskey instead of bones and blood,” or Elphaba’s explanation of her own re-invention: “I wouldn’t mind leaving myself behind if I could, but I don’t know the way out,” and, “I who have always been unbecoming am becoming un.”
In the end, Elphaba is a sympathetic character and only the most heartless among us wouldn’t grieve for what she becomes and what becomes of her. (I can think of at least one popular villain’s origin story that completely misses the mark here.) Though there is much clarification and revision of the story of The Wizard of Oz, and a sad and complex Wicked Witch of the West has been created, Maguire does not (or cannot) make Dorothy, our original heroine, into the villain. An antagonist (though reluctant), a pawn of the Wizard, extraordinarily naïve? Yes. But not the villain.
What a world…what a world.
A Year of Books I Should Have Read by Now
It's been some time since I've rad this book, but I remember being a little disappointed by it. However, I think that was more due to the hype (I'd had at least half a dozen people gush about it and go on and on about it being so masterful and wonderful and amazing) than to the book itself. In fact, it was well written and it was an interesting twist. But I think my expectations were set far too high. Someday I'd like to re-read it and see if it's better the second time around.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit I was hoping for more irony. And I couldn't figure the significance of some of the more "adult" scenes.
DeleteOverall, as I said, it was the writing (style, cadence, word usage, etc.) that I liked the most.
Don't get me wrong, I did enjoy it. I was just feeling a little let down. But I felt the same way about the movie Top Gun. I didn't see it until the mid-nineties and I'd heard repeatedly what a FANTASTIC movie it was, such a CLASSIC. But for it was like...eh. Whatev. (Though knowing you, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess Top Gun is probably not on your top ten list of Favorite Movies of All Time, either ;-) And I'd have to agree with you about the adult scenes. As I recall, they really served no purpose other than...shock value, I guess? They certainly didn't seem necessary for the plot.
Delete